|
|
|
SLAPP Law Slapped When
Court of Appeals Swats Gadfly
Hannabelle's Motion to Dismiss Denied
December 30, 2009
Minnesota Court of Appeals Judge Terri
Stoneburner affirmed the Hennepin District Court's decision, denying
Defendant Hannabelle's Motion to Dismiss the first of two defamation
lawsuits (D'Angelo/Freeman) wielded against the Bradbury Township resident
who fought Onamia City Hall to save her neighborhood from the imposition of
94 convicted juvenile sex offenders. Under Minnesota Statute 554.03 - the Anti-SLAPP
law, speech that is aimed in whole or in part at procuring government action
is protected from frivolous defamation suits. Such court-clogging suits are
brought against citizens who oppose deep-pocketed developers and cash-laden
corporations (such as Nexus) who would use such litigation to
intimidate and harass those who would speak up against them - in order to silence naysayers or, as Plaintiff Jim D'Angelo said - make them go away. [1]
The judges decision is confusing, (even
mind-boggling.) Before ruling against Hannabelle Judge Stoneburner first
determined that Hannabelle met the criteria of the Anti-SLAPP law -
(Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation]
She states:
"Appellant [Hannabelle] is a resident of
Bradbury Township and the founder and leader of Onamia Area Citizens for
Responsible Growth (OACRG), a citizen-based group in Onamia that vigorously
opposed the relocation of the Nexus treatment facility to Bradbury Township.
[Hannabelle] and other members of OACRG attended meetings and presented
petitions to government bodies involved, and engaged in other activities
directed at preventing the relocation. [Hannabelle] expressed strong views
opposing the relocation. [Hannabelle] communicated with her state
representatives, local and state government offices and departments, and
local and state officials, expressing the problems relocation would cause in
the neighborhood.
(to be cont.)
|
|
Top Stories
Mille Lacs Academy Director Indicted
Another MLA Sex Offender
Escapes
|